There was an issue operating a batch job which synched paper crypto positions between two inner databases. As A Outcome Of it didn’t run, not certainly one of the positions obtained transferred so it appeared like they disappeared from paper accounts. This is being addressed and should be fastened for tomorrow’s positions. Once More apologies and thanks for reporting this. There is presently a difficulty with the P&L and the cost basis reported for crypto which are being resolved. Crypto trades incur a ‘spread markup’ of .1%.

Issue With Crypto Buying And Selling After Account Reset

Dumb question, but how is that not just a fee? I would have assumed that the unfold would simply be reflected within the worth, and never tacked on afterwards. The dashboard must be up to date to replicate executed prices and P&L soon and will present the correct values.

@Dan_Whitnable_Alpaca , it’s taking place again. As of this morning my crypto positions (BTCUSD) are gone once more in my paper account. @Gabriel_Staples Each crypto positions and orders must be working fine now. The positions problem needed to do with a batch process which synchronizes a number of inner databases.

Crypto Positions Disappeared From My Paper Trading Account 5 Nov 2025 At 4:35:04am Et, “Position Doesn’t Exist”

It’s obtained to be some kind of bug with the crypto API as a result of my bot has no points once I trade company shares. It works as anticipated and the profits generate in my account. The paper trading for crypto is completely broken for per week or so.

There are no other hidden charges or commissions for crypto trading other than this ‘spread markup’. Last night time my ML algo made 49 trades, and according to the “Account Activities” forty one of them had been worthwhile with a total profit of $3,867. However the overview screen shows I lost $9,one hundred. I still can’t see either any official announcements or ETA when paper might be fastened.

Shedding Cash On Worthwhile Crypto Trades

I wrote a bot which buys and sells crypto, it only sells when there’s a 2% gain in revenue from when it was initially purchased. When these trades take place the Alpaca dashboard does indeed say the commerce was sold at a higher worth than when it was bought. However, the whole equity quantity on the paper trading account truly loses money.

What this means is if one is shopping for and the present ask price of $1000 then Alpaca will charge, or debit the account for a thousand x 1.001 or $1001. The price basis and P&L are at present incorrectly being reported as that quote price (eg $1000 within the above example) and never the actual executed value value (eg $1001 within the above example). The account fairness accurately voltarionai makes use of the executed costs.